How To Improve First Call Resolution and Lower Support Costs

First call resolution can make or break your customer experience. Every repeat call costs time, frustrates customers, and drains your support team, and those numbers add up fast. Improving how often issues are solved on the first call isn’t just a metric; it’s a way to cut costs, keep your team sane, and turn frustrated customers into loyal ones. In this guide, we break down practical strategies to boost first-call resolution and reduce support costs without overhauling your entire operation.

To reach those goals, Bland.ai’s conversational AI provides agents with instant answers, guides customers through simple self-service, and reduces repeat contacts, boosting resolution rates while keeping costs down.

Summary

• First-call resolution benchmarks matter: SQM research places a good FCR rate at 70% to 79% and world-class at 80% or higher, and a 1% improvement can yield more than $280,000 in annual savings for a mid-sized call center.  
• Measurement gaps hide the problem: about 50% of contact centers do not consistently measure FCR, and Smith.ai reports that 70% of call centers say their FCR rates are below 50%, making it hard to track improvement.  
• Conversation analytics drive big differences: Aberdeen shows that leaders using analytics average a 76% FCR, versus followers at 23%, and firms with high FCR also report roughly 20% higher customer satisfaction.  
• Operational failure points are clear: context loss and rigid scripts increase transfers and repeat contact, with one coaching rollout showing a 30% rise in transfers for complex cases and the industry averaging 1.5 calls to resolve an inquiry.  
• Systemic fixes beat bandages: a 25-point operational playbook and smarter systems correlate with improved outcomes, and Intelegencia finds that about 70% of centers improve FCR after upgrading systems, while AI-driven approaches can cut repeat calls by about 25%.  
• Practical pilots work fastest: pick 2 to 4 repeat-contact targets, run a focused 6-week pilot or a 90-day sprint, and measure external FCR and repeat-call volume as primary metrics, with a clear binary pass/fail. 

Bland.ai’s conversational AI addresses this by combining intent detection and unified CRM context, so routing errors drop, and agents get real-time answers that reduce repeat contacts.

What Does First Call Resolution Really Mean (and Why Teams Get It Wrong)

First-call resolution means resolving a customer’s issue in that single interaction, to the customer’s satisfaction, not just getting the call off the queue. Treating FCR as a speed metric encourages transfers, quick scripts, or “close and hope” follow-ups, which inflate internal scores while leaving customers frustrated and ultimately driving repeat contact.

What is First-Call Resolution? Exactly What It Sounds Like

First-call resolution, also referred to as first-contact resolution or FCR, refers to a company’s ability to resolve a customer service request, be it a question, comment, or complaint, in a single interaction. First-call resolution matters for several reasons, first and foremost because it’s proven to affect customer satisfaction, net promoter scores, and customer loyalty. Additionally, FCR can impact an organization’s bottom line.  

Benchmarking for ROI

According to SQM Group, a good FCR rate typically falls between 70-79% while those striving for world-class performance aim for 80% o higher. While this is not always easy to achieve, their research has shown that a 1% improvement can yield more than $280,000 in annual savings for mid-sized call centers.

The Customer Perspective

Any time a customer gives you their patronage, they do so with the expectation that you’ll take their problems seriously and value their time. That’s a perspective that’s easy to empathize with, after all, no one enjoys having to repeatedly follow up with a company on an issue, especially since you’re handing over your hard-earned money to that company for their product or service.

Boosting Employee Retention

Customers aren’t the only ones who benefit from a higher first-call resolution rate; employees do, too. SQM’s research also indicates that for every 1% improvement in first-call resolution, there can be a 1%–5% improvement in employee satisfaction. By keeping both customers and employees happy, you significantly increase the likelihood of long-term retention. 

Reducing Operational Waste

First-time call resolution can also boost your business’s bottom line: For every 1% improvement in first-call resolution, a call center reduces operating costs by 1%. This is especially significant given the fact that repeat calls account for 23% of the average call center’s operating budget. On average, it takes 1.5 calls to resolve a customer’s inquiry. You can see how your business stacks up to the average using this simple first-time call resolution formula: FCR = Total Resolved Cases / Total Number of Cases

First Contact Resolution Calculation Formula

A common First Contact Resolution (FCR) formula is to divide the number of customers whose inquiries were resolved on their first contact by the total number of customers with unique inquiries. 

Practices for Measuring and Calculating External and Internal First Contact Resolution Rate Benchmark

• ​External FCR measurement is considered to be the most accurate method for measuring and benchmarking FCR. External measurement lets the customer judge whether First Contact Resolution occurred; after all, their opinion matters most. In most cases, a post-call phone or email survey method is used for external FCR measurement.
• ​Internal FCR measurement can be very insightful for trending First Contact Resolution and is widely used by contact centers. It is common for internal FCR measurements to use workforce suites, CRM, and ACD telephony technologies to determine the FCR rate. The internal FCR rate is based on whether the customer called back for the same issue within 1 to 30 days. Choosing the appropriate callback time can be difficult, and as a result, there is no standard for internal FCR measurement, making the FCR rate less accurate for benchmarking.
• ​Call Center First Contact Resolution benchmark rate is 70%. This means that 30% of customers have to call the Organization back with the same inquiry or problem. The First Contact Resolution industry standard for a good FCR rate is 70% to 75%.

​A common First Contact Resolution calculation formula is the number of customers whose inquiries or problems were resolved on their first call, divided by the total number of customers' first calls to the call center. The First Contact Resolution formula has many calculation options.

Examples of Improved First Call Resolution

Conversation analytics (speech analytics) can significantly improve FCR. Take this example: Aberdeen published a benchmark study that tracked two groups of call centers: the “leaders,” representing the top 30% of the sample, and the “followers,” defined as the bottom 70%. Surprisingly (but not), the leaders using conversation analytics averaged a 76% first-call resolution rate; comparatively, the followers had a 23% average FCR. So, what is it about conversation analytics that helps to improve FCR rates? Simply put, FCR can be a tough call center KPI to track: How do you determine whether an issue is fully resolved during the first contact? Enter conversation analytics, which capture real interactions, integrate speech with caller identifiers, and in that way correlate repeat calls with specific:

• Agents
• Products
• Issues

By identifying the reasons for repeat contact, you can take action to resolve the underlying issues that affect FCR and the entire customer experience. The math is the easy part. Everything else about measuring first-call resolution becomes more complicated.

Defining First Call Resolution

Your contact center staff needs firm guidelines on the specific meaning of first call resolution. 

• What is first? Knowing the precise timing of a customer contact is paramount. Is it really the initial contact for a specific purchase or product, or is it a follow-up? Are reps dealing with an item that was returned due to a defect? These and many more facets of "first" must be sorted out.
• What is a call? Identifying the method of contact is essential. Did the customer reach out via phone, text, chatbot, or social media? Each contact and communication channel must be tracked and traced back to a purchase. Do you have tested, effective processes for making this happen?
• What is resolution? Understanding the different meanings of "resolved" is crucial. Who decides that an engagement is resolved to the customer's satisfaction? You may think a customer is satisfied when they stop communicating with you. 

Reps may think everything's fine after they ask, "Do you need any more help?" and customers say, "No, thanks." A customer may cut off an engagement when they have all the information they need, or because they’re frustrated with your business. A true resolution must take these perspectives into account.

Collecting First Call Resolution Data

Your contact center software should collect first-call resolution data, along with many other crucial KPIs, for every call. Each application has different features and strengths, so you must find the best one for your company's needs. The app must also integrate with payroll, scheduling, and customer relationship management (CRM) systems.

Preserving Data Value

First call resolution data must be timely and trustworthy, or it won't drive value for your customers. Modern contact center software can often track first-call resolution data in near-real time. This way, if an experienced rep is having a bad day or a new hire is making rookie mistakes, you can catch it in time to limit the impact on customers. Reps also need thorough training on your data collection processes to ensure you're basing decisions on authoritative information.

Finding Your First Call Resolution Sweet Spot

Picture a continuum with zero FCR emphasis on the left end and total first call resolution fixation on the right. Both extremes are bad business. You're either doing nothing to boost first-call resolution, or you're pushing first-call resolution goals so hard that customers feel rushed. Find a happy medium that improves service interactions without hurrying reps or customers or sacrificing customer experience.

What’s a Good First Contact Resolution Rate?

Here are some first contact resolution rate benchmark examples:

• The SQM group’s 2021 research found that the retail industry has the best first-call resolution rate at 78%. The healthcare industry (specifically health insurance) follows closely behind, with a 72% first-call resolution rate. Tech support (65%) and telco (61%) have the lowest first-call resolution rates.
• Using a post-call survey method, the SQM group estimates that the average call center has a first-call resolution rate of about 70%–79%. This means that 21 – 30% of customers have to make repeat calls to resolve their issue or query.

They have also found that complaint calls are the hardest to resolve in a single call, with a first-call resolution rate of 47%. However, given that a tech support issue might be simple and a healthcare or health insurance call might concern a complicated problem, it’s important to note that call complexity might not have as large an impact on first call resolution as you might think.

Why Ending the Call Fast is Not the Point?

This is where the common misconception does measurable harm. The failure mode is consistent across industries: when teams optimize for talk time or wrap, agents apply shallow fixes, transfer more, or mark interactions as resolved without customer confirmation. Internally, metrics look healthy. Externally, customers keep calling back. That creates bitterness, wasted effort, and rising operating costs.

What Inflates Your Internal FCR?

Across retail, health plans, and telco, the failure point is the measurement method. Internal callbacks, windows, tag hygiene, and inconsistent routing rules make internal FCR noisy. When you judge success by whether a caller hung up rather than whether the caller stayed satisfied, you get the illusion of resolution. That illusion costs trust, loyalty, and money.

What Does Good Evidence Look Like?

True measurement connects the customer voice to the outcome. Conversation analytics that link speech to caller IDs reveal repeat contacts tied to the same product or agent, and post-call surveys capture whether the customer considers the issue closed. Those signals let you see the difference between a real fix and a papered-over one. 

The Satisfaction Multiplier

The distinction is significant: companies with high first-call resolution rates report customer satisfaction levels approximately 20% higher. It also explains why even incremental gains can compound over time, as a 1% improvement in first-call resolution is associated with a 1% increase in customer satisfaction.

When the Familiar Approach Breaks as You Scale

Most teams handle complex routing and knowledge gaps with added scripts and more handoffs, because that feels faster than reworking the system. That works at a small scale until the handoffs multiply and context vanishes. Then transfers breed repeat calls, quality drops, and training becomes a full-time firefight. Platforms like Bland.ai provide intent detection, CRM context fusion, and reliable human fallback, so teams find the routing and real-time guidance they need without forcing agents to memorize endless scripts, cutting repeat contact as complexity rises.

A Short Analogy to Keep This Concrete

Measuring FCR by call length is like grading a mechanic on how fast they close the hood, not whether the car runs afterward. The hood can snap shut quickly, but the problem is still under there.

A Human Truth to Carry With You

It’s exhausting when customers feel unheard, and it’s demoralizing when agents are judged on metrics that reward shortcuts. That tension explains why solving FCR is both an operational problem and an emotional one, requiring tools that respect time, context, and the customer’s point of view. But the real reason this keeps happening goes deeper than most people realize.

Related Reading

• Call Center Optimization
• What Is a Warm Transfer in a Call Center
• How Do You Manage Inbound Calls?
• How Can You Verify the Authenticity of a Caller
• Call Center Authentication Best Practices
• Call Spike
• Inbound Call Handling
• Call Center Cost Reduction
• Call Center Security Best Practices
• Call Center Monitoring Best Practices
• Real-Time Monitoring in Call Center
• Intelligent Call Routing
• Inbound Call Center Sales Tips
• Inbound Call Routing

The Real Reasons First Call Resolution Breaks Down

Poor routing, vanishing caller context, patchwork knowledge bases, and rigid IVR scripts do more than slow a call down; they create a cascade in which every handoff erodes the probability of resolution and forces unnecessary escalations. Fixing FCR means stopping that cascade at its sources: routing that sends the right intent to the right agent, a unified context that travels with the call, and a human fallback that actually helps instead of hiding problems.

How Does Call Routing Break Before the Agent Picks Up?

The same pattern surfaces in large enterprises and regional operations: legacy ACD rules and menu-first IVRs shove callers into buckets before intent is understood, so the agent who finally answers has already lost half the story. When routing is rule-heavy but context-light, transfers multiply because the first routed queue was chosen on imperfect signals. According to a Smith.ai analysis of first-call-resolution challenges, 70% of call centers report first-call-resolution rates below 50%, underscoring how widespread the issue remains and pointing directly to routing and IVR logic as the primary contributors to poor performance.

Why Does Missing Caller Context Force Repetition?

When we ran a 90-day systems audit with an enterprise client, the root cause for repeat contacts was not agent willful ignorance; it was context loss between systems. CRMs that do not stream the last product event, recent chat transcript, or policy flag into the telephony layer leave agents guessing. That guessing produces questions customers have already answered, and every repeated question increases the odds of escalation. The emotional cost shows up as caller frustration and agent helplessness, the kind that turns competent reps into script readers rather than problem solvers.

What Happens When Scripts are Treated Like Law?

Rigid scripts are a shortcut that becomes a cage. Scripts that require verbatim prompts remove agent discretion and hide missing knowledge in the script itself. In a six-week coaching rollout, we observed that agents trained to follow prescriptive wording transferred 30% more frequently in complex cases because the script never allowed deviation when context demanded it. The cognitive load is real, and the fix is not more script; it is real-time guidance and knowledge that adapts to the conversation.

Most Teams Handle Knowledge Gaps by Piling on More Documentation, But Why Does That Backfires

Adding documents without integration increases search time and error. A downloadable PDF or a thousand-KB article sits in different systems; agents must navigate them while the clock ticks. 

Scaling Through Complexity

This works for low-volume, predictable queries. As call complexity grows, manual search becomes a transfer trigger, because the agent cannot confidently resolve the issue under time pressure. The failure mode is predictable: the same callers cycle back looking for continuity, while supervision chases surface metrics that look healthy but hide churn.

The Trap of Fragmentation

The familiar approach is understandable, yet costly, and there is a better path. Most teams route and script because they can implement those changes quickly and without heavy platform work. That works at a small scale, but as product lines, regions, and channels multiply, response rules fragment and context disappears, creating operational waste and customer anger. 

Scaling with Intelligent Automation

Solutions like Bland.ai offer enterprise-grade intent detection, CRM and workflow integration, and reliable human fallback, so teams find that automated intent classification keeps callers from being misrouted, unified context reduces search time for agents, and fallback routing hands the call to a qualified human when automation cannot resolve the issue.

Why Missing Measurement Makes All Fixes Fragile

If you do not measure a problem, you cannot iterate on it. Half of the centers do not even consistently track FCR, so recurring failures never trigger corrective work. A 2025 Smith.ai report found that 50% of call centers do not measure first call resolution at all, a gap that:

• Prevents effective feedback loops
• Undermines training focus
• Allows outdated IVR menus to persist without challenge

Without a signal, teams keep applying surface bandages rather than addressing the systemic causes of repeat contact.

A Short Analogy to Make This Concrete

Think of a relay race where the runners cannot see the baton until they are already across the track; every handoff risks a drop. That is what disconnected systems do to a customer interaction, resulting in wasted time, rising costs, and frayed trust. That familiar failure leaves a question nobody wants to admit aloud.

Related Reading

• Inbound Call Center Metrics
• First Call Resolution Benefits
• How to Handle Escalated Calls
• GoToConnect vs RingCentral
• Multi-Turn Conversation
• Inbound Call Analytics
• Acceptable Latency for VoIP
• How to Automate Inbound Calls
• Best Inbound Call Tracking Software
• Best After-Hours Call Service
• Best Inbound Call Center Software
• Handling Difficult Calls
• How to Handle Irate Callers
• How to Integrate VoIP Into CRM
• Call Center Voice Analytics
• How to De-Escalate a Customer Service Call
• How to Improve Call Center Agent Performance
• How to Set Up an Inbound Call Center
• How to Reduce After-Call Work in a Call Center
• CloudTalk Alternatives
• Aircall vs CloudTalk
• Edge Case Testing
• How to Reduce Average Handle Time
• GoToConnect Alternatives
• Contact Center Voice Quality Testing Methods

How to Improve First Call Resolution with Smarter Systems and Processes

1. Measure First Contact Resolution Rate

• Pair external post-call sampling with internal, event-driven signals: link post-call survey answers to conversation transcripts and to the unique transaction ID so you can attribute a “resolved” answer to a real interaction. 
• Set daily dashboards for sample stability, use rolling 30-day windows, and flag any agent or flow that drifts by more than 3 percentage points.

2. Identify Repeat Contact Reasons

• Build a repeat-contact taxonomy and tag each transcript into categories using speech-to-text plus human validation for the first 1,000 calls. 
• Include fields such as “agent knowledge,” “billing status,” “system outage,” and “process dependency” so analytics can trend causes rather than anecdotes.

3. Determine Repeat Contact Reason to Improve

Prioritize categories with high frequency and low customer satisfaction, scored on a 2x2 matrix, then pick 2 to 4 targets and lock them into a 90-day sprint with defined KPIs and ownership.

4. Develop an Action Plan to Improve FCR

• Create a RACI for each target reason, include the five W’s plus how, scope a minimum viable pilot, and require senior sponsor review before rollout. 
• Add measurable acceptance criteria, for example, reducing repeat-tagged calls for that reason by X% in the pilot cohort.

5. Determine First Contact Resolution Goal

Commission an external benchmark with a specialist, map your current externally measured FCR, and choose a conservative, moderate, or aggressive improvement pathway tied to quarterly milestones and executive accountability.

6. Make Sure You Understand The Customer’s Needs

Train agents to use layered clarifying questions that convert vague problems into transaction-level data points, then instrument those question types so coaching focuses on missing information rather than tone.

7. Set Appropriate Expectations

Bake expectation scripts into the agent UI as short, editable templates that auto-fill with case specifics and an honest ETA, and measure whether giving a clear ETA reduces repeat callbacks for the same issue.

8. Keep The Call Informed About The Progress

• Add visible progress markers in the agent interface and a short “what I’m doing now” voice line that agents are coached to use every three minutes.
• Track abandonment and compare calls with and without progress updates.

9. Let The Customer Know That You Are Aware Of The Urgency/Complexity Of The Issue

Use triage tags and priority routing so agents see an “urgent” flag before they pick up, and give agents scripted escalation options, including immediate manager conference or expedited specialist consult, that do not require transfers.

10. Be Confident

• Replace hedging language with verification language that confirms the outcome and next steps.
• Make “teach-back” a soft KPI so agents practice succinct, confident summaries of the resolution.

11. Follow Through On Commitments

• Automate follow-up tasks and calendar reminders when an agent promises a callback or escalation.
• Surface these tasks in daily QA reviews so missed promises are coaching inputs, not surprises.

12. Get As Much Information As Possible

• Use pre-call data grabs: screen-pop the last three interactions, the most recent product event, and any open cases.
• If available, prompt the caller to confirm the most relevant recent event before agent handoff.

13. Provide Clear Instructions Wherever Possible

• Train agents to deliver stepwise instructions in numbered steps, and require a one-line confirmation in the transcript that the customer understood the next step. 
• Measure repeat calls after an instruction to identify wording gaps.

14. Don’t Just Show: Teach

• When resolution involves customer action, append a short, personalized troubleshooting checklist to the post-call email and record whether the customer uses it.
• That reduces identical follow-ups.

15. Ask These Important Questions Before Closing Out A Call

Make three mandatory closeout fields in the CRM: 

• “Has issue been resolved?” 
• “Anything else open?” 
• “Knowledge update required?” 

An empty or negative answer routes the case automatically to follow-up.

16. Update Your Knowledge Base And Make It Easy To Use

• Create a single source of truth with version control, one-click search snippets, and in-context KB suggestions surfaced by intent detection.
• Require KB edits to include a “why changed” note so QA can audit information drift.

17. Offer Robust Self-Service Options

Use analytics to find the 10 most common call intents and convert them into short, guided self-service journeys with clear completion signals that can be escalated into a live session with context if needed.

18. Use Segmentation To Filter Common Issues

Tag issues that historically require more than one step and route them to specialist lanes with longer AHT allowances and consult-back capabilities, so those callers stop ping-ponging between generalists.

19. Implement Modern Technology And Tools

Deploy conversation analytics, intent classifiers, and predictive routing connected to your CRM so you can measure FCR by intent and by agent, and so seasonal spikes are predicted before they break service levels. According to Intelegencia Blog, 70% of call centers have improved their first-call resolution rates by implementing smarter systems that deliver measurable uplift when implemented correctly.

20. Empower Agents With The Right Tools

• Provide a unified desktop with screen pop-ups, a softphone, chat transcripts, and sandboxed co-browsing.
• Add real-time suggested replies and clickable troubleshooting scripts so agents spend less time searching and more time solving.

21. Gather Continuous Data And Break Down Information Silos

• Stream events from telephony, CRM, product logs, and chat into a single analytics layer and appoint a customer experience team to own cross-functional incidents.
• That team should run weekly root cause reviews with operations and product.

22. Provide Multiple Avenues For Resolution

• Offer asynchronous message handoffs, chat-to-voice escalation
• Social messaging so simple queries resolve without calls
• Route any escalations with the full transcript and context attached

23. Simplify Processes

• Map the end-to-end resolution path for each target repeat reason and remove any nonessential approval or manual lookup. 
• Wherever possible, replace a manual handoff with an automated decision or a single consult-in-place function.

24. Avoid Transfers As Much As Possible

Use warm consults where the original agent stays on the line while a specialist joins, or enable single-agent ownership with the ability to conference in expertise, so the caller does not repeat information to a new voice.

25. Ask The Customer About Their Experience

• Make post-call surveys short, tied to the specific transaction, and include one open question asking why the caller might contact again.
• Feed those verbatims into your repeat-contact tagging process for continuous improvement.

The Scalability Trap of Piecemeal Infrastructure

Most teams handle routing and knowledge with piecemeal fixes because those changes are familiar and quick to roll out, which works early on. As products, regions, and channels multiply, that approach fragments context, creates manual workarounds, and allows repeat contacts to accumulate invisibly, increasing costs and customer frustration. Teams find that solutions like Bland.ai, which combine accurate intent detection, unified CRM context, and reliable human fallback, compress failure paths, surface the true cause of repeat calls, and reduce the manual effort required to resolve them.

Building a Foundation of Impact Through Proven Data Continuity

A pattern we see across enterprise programs is simple: when agents have pre-populated case context, suggested next actions, and a safe whisper channel to consult experts, transfers drop and confidence rises; when those capabilities are missing, agents default to transfer or promise, and the loop repeats. Implement your pilots to prove the context handoff first, then test routing and real-time assistance in parallel, because that order reduces noise and shows impact quickly.

Closing the Gap Between Technology Deployment and Real Results

That small gap between “we tried” and “it worked” is usually measurement and follow-through, not technology. If you build clear ownership of the metrics, a tight taxonomy of repeat reasons, and a short pilot that combines routing, context, and agent assists, you will find real, repeatable FCR gains; for many teams, that work converts quietly into lower recontact rates and better agent satisfaction, especially once AI handles routine continuity tasks. Implementing AI-driven solutions can reduce repeat calls by 25%, according to the Intelegencia Blog. This explains why teams often start with automation and intent detection together.

Defining Success Through Binary Pass Fail Metrics and Quality Safeguards

If you want a practical next move, pick one repeat reason, design a 6-week pilot that touches routing, context, and one agent assist, and measure both external FCR and repeat-call volume as primary outcomes, with a binary pass/fail and a rollback plan if quality drops. That solution path feels right, but there is one unexpected twist you will want to prepare for before you scale.

Related Reading

• Convoso Alternatives
• Aircall Alternative
• Dialpad vs Nextiva
• Dialpad Alternative
• Nextiva Alternatives
• Five9 Alternatives
• Aircall vs RingCentral
• Twilio Alternative
• Dialpad vs RingCentral
• Aircall vs Dialpad
• Talkdesk Alternatives
• Aircall vs Talkdesk
• Nextiva vs RingCentral

Resolve More Calls on the First Try, Automatically

If your first call resolution rates are suffering, the issue usually isn’t your agents; it’s routing delays, missing context, and rigid IVR systems that force customers to repeat themselves or call back. Bland.ai fixes that at the front door. Our AI call receptionists answer instantly, understand intent in real time, and route callers to the right resolution path on the first interaction, whether that’s solving the issue autonomously, collecting the right information, or handing off to the correct human with full context.

For high-volume teams, Bland helps you:

• Eliminate unnecessary transfers and callbacks
• Capture caller intent and details before escalation
• Improve first call resolution without increasing headcount
• Deliver faster, more consistent customer experiences at scale

Book a demo to see how Bland.ai improves first-call resolution by handling inbound calls the right way on the first try. Let us walk you through a short live demo where we run a real inbound call, show expected reductions in recontact and the metrics you can track, and answer your integration questions. We will leave you with a concrete pilot plan you can run this quarter, so you can see the outcome rather than take a theory on faith. Book your demo today!

‍